Repair vs. Replace Reduced Claim By Nearly $150,000
Escalator Equipment Breakdown
Case Study
Expert Analysis/ Solution Based Results
Services Provided
Cause of Loss
Repair vs. Replace
BI-Mitigation
The Situation
A two-story retail store experienced a complete failure of one of its escalators, rendering it inoperable for approximately six months. Initial troubleshooting efforts by the maintenance provider were unsuccessful, and the escalator repeatedly shut down after only a few seconds of operation, displaying a handrail speed deviation fault. Repair efforts included removal and attempted refurbishment of the controller; however, the issue persisted. The OEM advised that the controller had been discontinued, leaving the insured with limited options. Two modernization proposals were presented, ranging from approximately $158,000 to $225,000, both involving significant mechanical and electrical upgrades.
Equipment Impacted
- Escalator System
- Controller
- Drive System
- Handrail System
Value-Driven Solutions
Root Cause Identification
An oil analysis confirmed that the gearbox failure resulted from the use of incorrect lubricant. Viscosity levels were outside manufacturer specifications, leading to internal wear and component failure.
Technical Validation of Repair Scope
Coordinated with the OEM and specialists to evaluate repair vs. replace options, confirming that full gearbox replacement was the most appropriate and cost-effective solution.
Defensible Documentation
Provided clear, evidence-backed findings and cost validation to support claim handling and ensure alignment with industry standards.
The Results
Full Restoration
Installation of a programmed replacement controller restored the escalator to normal operation.
Reduced Claim Exposure
Final repair cost was $45,000, avoiding over $150,000 in unnecessary modernization costs compared to initial proposals.
Minimized BI
Identified a targeted repair solution that restored service quickly, avoiding delays from full modernization.
Real Claims, Real Results