Clear Repair Vs. Replace Guidance
Educational Facility
Case Study
Hurricane-Induced Generator and Electrical Damage
Services Provided
Repair vs. Replace
Solution Based Results
BI-Mitigation
The Situation
Following a hurricane, an educational facility sustained widespread saltwater flooding, submerging multiple generators (21–26 inches) and disrupting electrical systems across campus. Repair decisions were delayed as the insured evaluated relocation, upgrades, and code-related elevation requirements. Clarity was needed on damage extent, repair feasibility, and the most practical path forward.
Equipment Impacted
- Backup Power Generators
- Generator Electrical Enclosures
- Electrical Distribution Panels
- Underground Electrical Utilities
- Chiller Systems
- Compressors
- Transformers
- Passenger Elevators
- Laboratory Equipment
- Lighting Systems
Value-Driven Solutions
Comprehensive Damage Assessment
Inspection confirmed widespread saltwater intrusion across generators and electrical systems.
Repair vs. Replacement Guidance
Analysis determined several generators were not economically repairable due to internal damage risk. Rebuild and replacement options were evaluated to support informed decisions.
Code and Design Evaluation
Elevation requirements and structural limitations for replacing the boilers were identified, and practical solutions were outlined to ensure compliance.
System Restoration Validation
Electrical systems and underground utilities were evaluated, and key equipment, including chillers, was verified operational following restoration.
The Results
Repair vs. Replace
Guidance prevented repair attempts on heavily impacted generators that were likely to fail again.
Defensible Claim Development
Established a replacement scope exceeding $600,000, supporting accurate valuation.
Accelerated Decision-Making
Repair feasibility and code requirements, enabling timely recovery planning.
Restored Operations
Critical systems were returned to service across affected areas.
Real Claims, Real Results