Solution To Repair Instead of Replace Reduced Claim By $1.5M
Fire Damage on Aluminum Casing Line
Case Study
Fire Damage
Services Provided
Repair vs. Replace
The Situation
A fire ignited during resin tank repairs at an automotive casting plant, disrupting power and causing a high-production aluminum casing line to cool and solidify. The event halted operations and damaged pressure vessels and equipment that dated back decades, had been customized over time, and no longer had original equipment manufacturer support. Given the extended lead times required to build a new line, the facility needed a rapid, technically sound restoration strategy to meet production commitments.
Equipment Impacted
-
Casing Line
-
Resin Tank
-
Pressure Vessels
-
Supporting Equipment
Value-Driven Solutions
Restoration and Equipment Assessment
A comprehensive engineering evaluation was conducted to assess damage to the resin tanks, pressure vessels, and associated machinery and equipment. The assessment focused on determining whether highly customized and aging system components could be safely restored to pre-loss condition despite the absence of OEM support and unique production configurations.
Partnership and Recertification Planning
Collaboration was established with specialized restoration and pressure vessel recertification experts to develop a targeted rebuild plan. The restoration strategy included repair of tanks and mechanical components while ensuring equipment met operational and certification requirements to resume production.
Safety Compliance Integration
The restoration plan incorporated updates to electronics, pneumatics, hydraulics, plumbing, programming, and safety infrastructure to meet current code and operational requirements. Equipment layout modifications, including pressure vessel placement and enhanced system controls, were implemented to improve safety and long-term reliability.
The Results
Repair Over Replacement Strategy
Engineering analysis verified that the aluminum casing line and supporting machinery could be restored to pre-loss condition within the required five-month production timeline, eliminating the need for a full system rebuild.
Claim Cost Reduction
The repair strategy reduced the overall claim exposure by approximately $1.5 million compared to replacement costs associated with constructing a new production line.
Reduced BI and Production Recovery
The restoration and recertification efforts enabled production capabilities to resume more quickly than new system construction would have allowed, helping the facility maintain customer commitments and minimize operational downtime.
Real Claims, Real Results